What I mean when I say 'outcomes over activity' — and why it's harder than it sounds.
Let's get one thing straight. Honest work — that's not a take designed to be comfortable. It's designed to be useful.
Here's the pattern I see at least once a week: founder hires a marketer, marketer hires a tool, tool produces a dashboard, dashboard fills a slide, slide goes in a board pack. Revenue doesn't move. Nobody is lying. Everybody is busy. And nothing is working.
The fix isn't a better dashboard. It's a smaller strategy.
Three bets for ninety days. Two of them you are willing to kill in public. One of them you will defend against every opinion in the room. That's the plan. Everything else — the beautiful campaign you already paid for, the event you already booked, the "brand refresh" your designer is quietly working on — either supports those three bets, or it waits.
Most B2B marketing problems aren't marketing problems. They're strategy problems dressed up in campaign clothes. The symptoms show up downstream — low conversion, long sales cycles, the pipeline that 'just isn't landing' — but the leak is almost always upstream. Usually in who you're selling to and why they should care. Sometimes in who's calling the shots. Rarely, if ever, in whether the creative was good enough.
So when I say the opposite of hope is not a strategy, I don't mean hope is bad. I mean hope alone is expensive. Pair hope with a priority, a deadline, and a CFO-legible outcome, and you have a strategy. Everything else is a mood.
That's all this is. A method, not a mood.
Three bets for ninety days. Everything else waits. This is the hardest sentence in B2B marketing.
If you made it this far, we probably share a bias: that marketing is a craft with numbers attached, not a brand project with money attached. If you want to pressure-test that bias against a real business — yours — I offer a free 30-minute consultation. No slides.
Pressure-test this on your business.
Free 30-min consultation. No slides.
